Kind of Sort of Really (not) Relevant
So, I'm hoping to get this AWESOME costume at a reduced price somewhere:
This is brilliant. Absolutley brilliant. This has to be the best execution of the Naughty Librarian archetype I have ever seen. The cape may very well by my favorite part of the ensemble, but the book-print skirt is a close second. Let's go in for a close-up of said skirt, shall we?

Now, not many people know this, but public librarians are required by law to own and wear bookprint clothing. It varies from state to state, but I know in New York, it has be at least 40% of your clothing.
Four books? Was that all the titles they could think up? And how, exactly, does "Short Stories" fit into the whole sex motif? And the cape. I can't get over the cape. What the hell is the deal with the cape? That's not "sexy," that's "baffling" or "incogruous."
Anyway, I suppose the whole point of this entry is to demonstate one of the (bad) examples of a subversive image of librarians in popular culture. It's certainly not worth $60 in my opinion, but I'm cheap as hell. I'd grocery shop at GoodWill, were that possible. That said, it just might be a little telling that the model is wearing a strand of pearls; that seems to be a part of the overall image of the Naughty/Sexy Librarian. (I also happen to own a strand of pearls myself.) (Shut up.)